Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm a Celebrity... Get Me out of Here! Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete as lacking stand-alone notability. Merge was considered, but the main article for the associated subject already covers this subject in adequate detail. I am willing to userfy this article for anybody who wants to merge some of the content, however.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 00:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm a Celebrity... Get Me out of Here! Now
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Support programme for a notable program. However the programme in the article is not notable itself and fails WP:RS (by having none at all). -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 08:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Not enough to justify own article, and already covered in main article subsection, otherwise I'd say merge. Paulbrock (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nationally broadcast series on a major network and we're not talking about a 10-minute featurette; according to the infobox this is a full one-hour show. The fact it's a "support series" is irrelevant. See Doctor Who Confidential for an example of a similar series (and I do not recognize WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS as a valid counterargument here). 23skidoo (talk) 12:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, but DWC, plus Torchwood Declassified and Heroes Unmasked, are documentaries about drama series, and therefore sit less well in the article of the program they accompany. IACGMOHN is more akin to Big Brother's Little Brother or Big Brother's Big Mouth both of which are lumped together in List of Big Brother (UK) shows, spun out of the main Big Brother (UK) article, when it became too large. Paulbrock (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Paulbrock. Stifle (talk) 12:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into a section of the main program's article. It doesn't have enough of an existence outside of that. - Richfife (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article's content is virtually identical to that of the main article subsection, so there's no point in having its own article.  Delete this and wait to recreate the article until the subject has more information of note than is plausible to have in the current subsection. SunDragon34 (talk) 23:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.