Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I’ll Be Your Girl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that there's enough coverage to keep the page until the official release. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I’ll Be Your Girl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not satisfy musical notability. Unreleased albums or songs seldom satisfy musical notability. Notability is not inherited from the performers. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Seems pretty stupid and incredibly pedantic to delete an article which will clearly satisfy notability very soon. And to be frank is notable now. Stupid, pointless discussion and a complete and utter waste of everyone above's time.
 * Keep. Hmm, yes it's unreleased...but it gets released in a month and there's already loads of coverage, so deleting it now would be pointless. --Michig (talk) 07:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agree with Michig - this article has been created too soon, but their last two albums reached no. 1 and no. 7 on the Billboard 200 so I think we can be pretty confident that this record will have plenty of reviews and a chart position four weeks from now, so the deletion isn't worth it. Richard3120 (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Could we move it to user space instead of deleting or keeping something which may be slightly WP:TOOSOON? SportingFlyer (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you had waited a few weeks to create the page and for notability to be satisfied then instead of "soon" then we might not be having this "stupid, pointless discussion". Richard3120 (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, just let the article snowball. No point in deleting. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.