Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Free


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I-Free

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A massive advertisement, tagged since 2016, with no reliable sources provided to support any claims. Made by two PR-editors. It currently doesn't meet WP:CORP and can hardly be fixed otherwise than recreated from scratch. VanoTheOldest (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Russia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG. While the main company's business appears to have faded due to app stores dominating its market, and there is no clear indication of recent notable activity, there is a lot of coverage from the early 2000s. During that time, it was considered to be among the top three companies in the market. Some examples of non-trivial coverage:
 * https://www.comnews.ru/content/32946
 * https://www.forbes.ru/forbes/issue/2015-03/280917-troe-mobilnykh
 * https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/ifree_vyshel_v_kitaj --PaulT2022 (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am saying this because even though a user tried to reduce the amount of promotional content earlier in it, this article has so few reliable sources to support many of the claims (there are only three citations seen in total). Also, four of the six sections are entirely unsourced. Hence, it gives deep concern about whether the information can be verified. ST7733B (talk) 23:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It's been tagged for G11 speedy deletion, I'd not worry about it here until that gets solved. Oaktree b (talk) 13:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete WP:G11 Kinopiko  talk 19:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The article seems to lack independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the company. Failing WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG, and I've concerns about the promotional tone of this article that violates WP:NPOV, WP:NOTADVERTISING,
 * PD Slessor (talk) 00:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.