Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Lotus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 07:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I-Lotus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. There are millions of 200 person companies creating a specific, unremarkable, niche product, and this is one of them. Stephen 10:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Leaning delete - I haven't been able to find any reliable sources, news or otherwise, on this company. Can anyone produce third party info? I'd say 95% of the hits are related to a restaurant or nothing relative. Without such coverage, the company pretty clearly fails WP:CORP. I will state, for the record, that I disagree with the notion that just because a company has only 200 employees and is small shouldn't be a reason for delete. There just aren't reliable sources giving info or demonstrating notability. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 13:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - There doesn't appear to be any third-party sources on the subject, therefore the company does not meet notability. If sources to pop up that prove notability, I will be happy to reconsider. D.M.N. (talk) 18:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. pure and utter spam. Gorgonzola (talk) 20:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it would be useful if someone bought a product from them and then wanted to know a bit about it. That's what Wikipedia is for, isn't it? Myrrideon (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an advertisment. D.M.N. (talk) 07:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As the nominator said. No sources independent of the company provided. RayAYang (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.