Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Mag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 10:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I-Mag

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:WEB criteria - I couldn't find anything about it on Google or Google News. There are a few results for "Islamic Magazine" but it's a different publication. No sources at all in the article, and it doesn't state either why the website is notable. Laurent (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - as described, this is not notable; there are other, similarly named sites that may be notable. Bearian (talk) 21:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete A fairly well written article, but sadly it does not seem to pass WP:GNG, as it does not seem to have been the subject of any secondary sources, nor does it have any indication that it passes the criteria for WP:WEB SpitfireTally-ho! 19:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.