Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Walt Disney anthology television series.  Sandstein  07:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I-Man

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A WP:BEFORE search didn't come up with any RS covering this film. The film has a one-sentence mention in The Encyclopedia of Fantasy here and a short listing in The Wonderful World of Disney Television: A Complete History here, both of which don't add up to in-depth coverage. Kbabej (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: as not notable. The article includes the names of living people. Lacks reliable and independent sources. Otr500 (talk) 03:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Redirect to Walt Disney anthology television series, preserving history. I can verify this movie exists and there are some mentions in books: , and It is listed as #37 in a list of the “The Best TV Shows that were never” made, which is a significant non-trivial mention in an independent reliable source: . Considering this movie is from the mid-1980s, and was broadcast on network television, these sources establish enough notability to not make this a hard delete.  Also: Currently available on Youtube to watchSamboy (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify Redirect to Walt Disney anthology television series - Yes, the movie exist although not noted, the article is lack of references requires lots of work to make it more encyclopedic. Strongly suggest to be heavily edited with more independent sources. Or else, just delete it - Jay (talk) 06:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The article is from 2006, and the original author is not an active editor any more (this is one reason I think the bar for deletion should be higher is something has been on the Wikipedia that long without getting deleted) I support making it a draft again, but who should clean up the article?  Better to just make it a redirect, preserving history.  Samboy (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Changed my vote to redirect. -Jay (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.