Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-No


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Guilty Gear characters. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I-No

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article mostly relies on passing mentions and rankings/listicles. WP:BEFORE shows zero WP:SIGCOV. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Guilty Gear characters. Reception's entirely top-10 lists, there is a serious dearth of significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is there really not enough on I-No? I know (no pun intended) Guilty Gear is a niche franchise and everything, but she's one of those characters known for their sex appeal, much like Ivy from Soulcalibur and Morrigan from Darkstalkers. Anyway, here is one source, but its from Bounding Into Comics, a site whose reliability is questionable at best. Though I can't access the whole thing, this book seems to talk about her too. Maybe they can be used if, by chance, someone finds enough coverage to keep the article, or revive it in the future? MoonJet (talk) 03:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, BIC is a hard no. They've got a pretty extreme POV that I feel affects their ability to provide verifiable content. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll second that hard no and add a hell no to Bounding.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Third that per my below-mentioned “boobs aren’t notable” comment and also because BiC is a reactionary garbage site promoting non-controversies as news. Dronebogus (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I’ve always had some skepticism about boobs making a character notable. Drooling over a character’s MAJOR HAWTNESS is not “critical analysis”. Dronebogus (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.