Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-OOA (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I-OOA
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSOFT and has done so since we imported it from FOLDOC. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * delete as above Deunanknute (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Certainly fails this requirement for inclusion: "The software is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field." Pretty obscure tool. —  Noah  03:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search did not turn up any significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.