Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-exceed Technology Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and salt. Also noting prior salting. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

I-exceed Technology Solutions
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I declined a speedy deletion request for this article because on balance there are sufficient breadth of references in reliable secondary sources to make at least some claim to notability. However, most are simply reprints of company press releases, so they may lack sufficient depth. Bringing to AfD to allow a wider audience review on whether this company meets the general notability guideline. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as I also concurred with considering speedy delete, none of this comes close at all for actual substance; and I myself actually even voted Delete at the 1st AfD. I honestly believe Salting is best here because it simply shows the persistence. SwisterTwister   talk  04:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete They have been trying to get this article up on Wikipedia for a long time now. All kinds of name permutations have been tried. The coverage about the company is simply routine coverage - the best I found was this. None of this satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH. Considering that they have been trying to get this article up for a long time, I would say we can SALT the title. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt the various name permutations per Lemongirl942 - David Gerard (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.