Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-recycle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

I-recycle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unclear notability since September 2010; Article itself notes that as of February 2011, the domain had become parked, and I'm struggling to find any reference to it, though this may be muddled by it's rather generic name.

Either way, it appears that this website never seems to have gotten off the ground, and hasn't received any notable coverage from outside sources. Pokemonprime (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Pokemonprime (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, never heard of it and I'm not finding any references either. Mujinga (talk) 02:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article describing the proposition of an initiative which appears to have existed only briefly. Searches are not finding coverage needed to establish notability (WP:NORG / WP:NWEB / WP:GNG). AllyD (talk) 08:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.