Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I.R.S. Records Presents The Cutting Edge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

I.R.S. Records Presents The Cutting Edge
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Wylie pedia  12:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article consists entirely of one infobox, one reference, and a one-paragraph lead (which makes up the entire content). Not notable at all. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 00:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Retracting my nomination for deletion. It's obvious that the article is being expanded upon, which is great. (However, it really ought to be done in the draft namespace.) The article appeared as such when I nominated it for deletion, which was my reasoning. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 05:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SwiftyPeep (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwiftyPeep (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. This show ran on MTV for years and the usual searches turn up substantial coverage in reliable sources, including for example this book about the history if MTV; a substantial article in a 1985 Billboard; this university press book discussing one episode's important impact on the Austin music scene of the mid 1980s; a 1985 LA Times article that calls it "the best program about pop music that we have".  Passes GNG and suitable for improvement, not deletion. --Arxiloxos (talk) 07:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If it shouldn't be deleted, it should be moved to the draft space. There is nowhere near enough content to declare it a valid article. It's existed for 8 years and has a total of 27 edits to the article - it's obviously not going to be expanded any further. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 07:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: I see that the article is being improved, and it now has at least enough substance and cited references to fully establish notability. Keep on improving! Lwarrenwiki (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article content does not determine notability. Has been greatly improved and you can add this source to the list of coverage as well. Timothy Joseph Wood  18:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: meets WP:GNG Mecha Bieber (talk) 05:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.