Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. Kimbell Hicks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  09:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

I. Kimbell Hicks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No claim of notability. Fails WP:NPOL Rusf10 (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Melbourne FL is not a large or important enough city to confer an automatic presumption of notability on all of its mayors under WP:NPOL just because they existed, but this is not referenced anywhere near well enough to actually pass WP:NPOL #2: the article is referenced 6/7 to unreliable sources that are not support for notability at all, such as primary source genealogical records on FamilySearch.com (which we are not allowed to use as sourcing on here at all!), and the one that actually comes from a real newspaper isn't enough all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the article reads well, but is slapped together from sources which don't meet WP:GNG as Bearcat notes. A quick WP:BEFORE search of archival newspapers doesn't bring up anything helpful. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.