Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. P. Gautam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

I. P. Gautam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non Notable Civil Servant. An office in the civil service is not inherently notable unless it can be shown that the subject has done something to distinguish themselves. Merely being the Municipal Commissioner of a city does not indicate any notability. He is not an elected official like a mayor. More importantly, the sources have to specifically be about the person. It would be easy to find google hits when the subject has a common name and often announces government decisions. But notability needs to be shown independently of these routine news. As far as I could see, I did not see anything to distinguish the subject from a run of the mill civil servant. The coverage has been more about stuff related to his office than actually about him. Uncletomwood (talk) 10:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Question How much like a mayor is a municipal comissioner. If they are basically like a mayor I think Gautam is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment No, there is the post of Mayor which exists in the Municipal Corporation who is the head. A Municipal Commissioner is like the Principal Manager of the Corporation. He's a bureaucrat and not an elected representative. Uncletomwood (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only "reference" is a dead link. Nothing suggests notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- yet another vanity page on an unremarkable low-level bureaucrat. No claim of notability as the subject does not meet WP:NPOL. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject has a lot of media coverage. I think if a subject is regularly getting mentioned in main stream media, that says the person is notable. Here are few independent articles about the subject -, . The two article from Daily News and Analysis and The Times of India has I. P. Gautam as the main subject apart from hundreds of articles that have mentioned him , , , , , . Pratyush 09:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PratyushSinha101 (talk • contribs)
 * Most are just quoting the subject peripherally and are not about the subject. The other references are relatively minor and not significant enough to show notability.--Rpclod (talk) 10:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In 1st and 2nd link, the whole article is about the subject. How much more such articles are required to show notability? And most of the links have direct relation to the subject like the metro project related link have given him due importance as he is the head of the project. References given are from the leading media houses of India. And as I said earlier, hundreds of similar links are available, if more are required to prove notability. I can add more. You don't get mentioned over 100 times in leading media houses of the country unless you are notable.

Pratyush 11:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PratyushSinha101 (talk • contribs)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Nordic  Nightfury  12:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  12:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails to meet WP:GNG. Anup   [Talk]  21:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.