Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAPCC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

IAPCC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't pass WP:ORG. The most reliable source is from the Associated Press, which is a paid piece. Most sources that come up are social media pages and self published blogs. Can't find any source that demonstrates this passes even WP:GNG. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Yours,  Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Yours,  Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Yours,  Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete references 2 and 3 have expired. Article is too brief. Teraplane (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again Teraplane. Please note that brevity is not an appropriate ground for deletion :). Cabrils (talk) 00:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I could not find a single reference via a database search of Australian and NZ newspapers. I could not find a single appropriate ref via Google. At this time fails GNG. Cabrils (talk) 00:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.