Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAmScientist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

IAmScientist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was a low importance crowdfunding site that now appears to be defunct. See Non functioning home page
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 9.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 01:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter   (constabulary)  @ 21:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. If it was ever sufficiently notable in the first place, the fact of its going defunct shouldn't affect notability, per WP:NTEMP. But I don't think it is or was notable. I certainly couldn't dig up better sources than the ones already in the article using Google news archive, and the ones already there are very weak. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment wp:notability is not temporary. If a subject has sufficient notability for wikipedia, then just because the company no longer exists does not stop that notability. That said, the article may just be suitable for WP:SPEEDY deletion G7, author request.Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.