Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBPT Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 10:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

IBPT Corporation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources offered to support notability, and few Google hits. Apparent conflict of interest; only reference links to study written by author of the article. Persistent removal of templates without explanation. Same conflict of interest and vandalism of templates at Sergey Sheleg. JNW (talk) 03:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, non notable company. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This company is the only company in the world working on hypothermic biopreservation using clathrate-forming gases. This company published a reserach paper in a peer reviewed journal cited in PubMed (research paper is the most aspect of notability). Ssheleg (talk)5 July 2009
 * Delete per nom--I don't see any notability here, and having published one paper is certainly not enough (unless that paper is called "Die im elektromagnetischen Felde auf ruhende Körper ausgeübten ponderomotorischen Kräfte " or some such thing). Drmies (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only 106 Google hits (that's if you put it in quotes)--and none of them are very good. Article as written borders on a G11 due to the high COI (in fact, I'm about to block the author as a spam-only account)--but if someone who's even more rougish than I am spikes this article, I won't object. Blueboy96 04:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Leaving aside concerns about the technology itself, there is not one single shred of evidence that the company is notable. Note: The blocked author has also been editing Cryostasis (clathrate hydrates). That might need looking at and possibly reverting or tagging for improvement. The article is all but incomprehensible to a non-expert reader as it currently stands. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a research company. Kindly ask any wiki moderators who have some expertise in similar fields to allow this article in wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.79.70 (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.