Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBSN (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to ISBN - Liberatore(T) 19:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

IBSN
It seems to be more a non-notable curiosity (introduced very recently) than a widely accepted identification number. Already listed once for deletion, the discussion was cut short because of a copyright problem, which has since been resolved, so I am now relisting it. Schutz 15:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I was about to ask you what on Earth made you nominate ISBN for deletion, and then I read the article. Delete, non-notable curiosity, possibly creates confusion. J I P  | Talk 15:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No assertion that this is notable or that it's widely used as a reference number to the hundreds of thousands of blogs out there. Besides, blogs already have a unique reference: a URL.  Delete.  -- E lkman - (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and definitely redirect to ISBN, which is what I thought this was. A probable source of confusion. Grand  master  ka  19:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete and Redirect to ISBN, but consider tagging the redirect as, in case this grows enough. -- ReyBrujo 03:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into ESBN Computerjoe 's talk 13:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hum... I wonder whether ESBN should also be listed for deletion... It seems more well known than this IBSN, but still not something widely recognised. We'll see. Schutz 16:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete; not impossible it will catch on and become notable. Runcorn 16:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.