Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICC Player of the Month


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ICC Awards. Redirects are cheap, otherwise this would be a delete. Tone 20:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

ICC Player of the Month

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence that this award is meaningful or at all notable enough to pass WP:GNG- every source in the article is a primary source (as the ICC is the one handing out the awards) Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - and very strongly at that. This is list cruft, it's meaningless and is already a long and tedious list. Player of the year, yeah, OK I suppose. Player of the month isn't something we should be recording on wikipedia. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom/BST. Off the top of my head, I think only Cricket Ireland even mention the nom/winner on their website, with other cricket boards not really covering this award.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and others comments. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete . Does not seem to be a notable award, with only WP:ROUTINE coverage to be found in reliable independent sources. Additionally, almost all the prose was copy-pasted from the ICC media release, so the article needs a huge WP:REVDEL if kept (seems unlikely) . This has now been removed, content summarised, and I've added the one non-ICC source I managed to find. wjematherplease leave a message... 14:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ICC Awards, as a valid WP:ATD. Content worth preserving already exists at this target, so no merge required. wjematherplease leave a message... 12:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I also support this redirect, as a valid WP:ATD. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Several articles exist like this that are essentially WP:LISTCRUFT. StickyWicket (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This article does not pass WP:GNG it has no secondary sources, not notable enough. Juggyevil (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ICC Awards per User:Wjemather above.  Frank  Anchor  16:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.