Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICER Brands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  19:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

ICER Brands

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability. None of the references specifically mention ICER at all (at least, from what I saw). Smacks of advertising/PR. Perhaps some of the info can be merged with Nobody Beats the Wiz. Also, note that article creator is essentially dodging a repeated speedy deletion of ICER Brands, LLC - right or wrong. Tan  &#124;   39  16:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I tagged the original ICER Brands, LLC article for Speedy Delete when it first came online. Time to cut the spam again. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:SPAM failing WP:CORP. Reads like a WP:CV for investors.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note... WP:CV deals with copyright problems. I assume Michael Q. meant to say that it reads as an investment CV or similar. Tan   &#124;   39  17:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry. I did mean a corporate curriculum vitae.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Speedy-worthy spam. Bongomatic (talk) 02:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, possible speedy delete, no showing of importance at all. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I can only echo the reasons above. doktorb wordsdeeds 16:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.