Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICI Homes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 03:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

ICI Homes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article, does not meet WP:NCORP ("largest homebuilder and the 4th largest family-owned business in Volusia County " is not grounds for notability). MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. NCORP is irrelevant if WP:GNG is otherwise satisfied, and while it's marginal, I believe there's just enough here to demonstrate that. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete fails WP:GNG criterion for inclusion in encyclopedia as shown by WP:BEFORE. Luciapop (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The article notes: "Like a college football team rising in the polls, ICI Homes continues to climb in an annual ranking of the nation's top home builders. Builder magazine's May issue, published Wednesday, ranks the locally headquartered company 57th on this year's Top 100 list, up from 76th last year. Started by Mori Hosseini in 1980, ICI has been a fixture on Builder's list since 1998. This was the company's best showing."  The article includes analysis from Susan Little, an analyst with Raymond James & Co. in St. Petersburg. The article notes, "ICI is headed in the right direction if it wants to become a public company, she said, though. 'I have a tendency to like home builders who have some geographic diversity. If you have a downturn in one market, you have the opportunity to grow in other markets,'" Little said.  The article notes: "With headquarters in Daytona Beach, ICI Homes has built more than 10,000 homes in more than 100 communities throughout Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and North Carolina."  The article notes: "As chairman and CEO of ICI Homes — consistently ranked by Builder Magazine among the nation's Top 100 homebuilders and the area's biggest — he's made a fortune."  The article notes: "Hosseini's company, ICI Homes, which he founded in 1980, is the 47th largest homebuilder in the nation."</li> <li> The article notes: "ICI builds everything from townhouses to production houses to luxury custom houses. The company reported sales of 767 houses in 2002 and gross revenue of $218 million. It builds in central and northeastern Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee."</li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow ICI Homes to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 09:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC) </li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To scrutinize and discuss credibility of sources provided.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - there is enough analysis in the sources above to justify a keeping of the article and a passing of WP:NCORP; for example #3 and #6 clearly address the company directly and the analysis contains enough depth Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as appears notable per above points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.