Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICT4Autism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

ICT4Autism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Regional charity of minor notability and very small size (5 staff). Only one source currently which is the entry on the list of charities. Lesion ( talk ) 18:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Article's creator was a user called Andyhuggett, whilst I note the founding trustee is listed as Sally Huggett. WP:conflict of interest (see especially WP:conflicts of interest (medicine)). This user also created the article The LIME Magazine which is linked to this org. Nominated both. Lesion  ( talk ) 19:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note The provided source is now a broken link. I also don't think this organization even exists anymore – not cause for deletion, but nonetheless an interesting note. Their website is now an available domain, and the most reliable source I found is almost three years old. This source does however show that they worked with Sony. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 00:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. A worthwhile cause, but not notable. LT90001 (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability per WP:NGO and WP:GNG. The number of non profits in the USA has doubled in the past 10 years, there are now nearly a million in the US. The UK has probably seen a similar surge. Most of them are small charities who do good work. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.