Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICT Laboratory of Piedmont Regional Administration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

ICT Laboratory of Piedmont Regional Administration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 16.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  14:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This appears to be just a local authority specialist division, and not unusual in that respect. The articles referenced in the article are from Forum PA, described as "a company specialized in public relations and corporate communications". Insufficient evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.