Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC 3402


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

IC 3402

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. C messier (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 16:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep IC 3402. I firmly believed the article can be expanded with more references possibility meeting Wikipedia's guidelines. Galaxybeing (talk) 05:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've found multiple reliable sources for IC 3402 and added them inside the article. Hopefully it can meet notability guidelines. Galaxybeing (talk) 11:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, do you mind listing them here? ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 11:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...320...96G/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A%26AS...86..109G/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...342..718G/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.4336M/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999BSAO...47....5K/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AN....314...97K/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..714B/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.3749Y/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220....3K/abstract
 * https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...45T/abstract
 * https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abb66b
 * https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4365/ac626b Galaxybeing (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Here's the sources I've found online so far Galaxybeing (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * These are all listings in tables with objects, they don't provide significant commentary on this specific galaxy. Being mentioned alongside other similar objects, such as in a table of properties of 200 newly discovered supernovae, does not constitute non-trivial coverage. (from WP:NASTCRIT) C messier (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree, these sources provide no significant commentary on this object. ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 15:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: yet another galaxy that is in a bunch of catalog papers but not notable itself. - Parejkoj (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 03:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: it shows up in a few studies, but without substantial coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.