Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. BJ Talk 20:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

ICab

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A not notable web browser that fails having reliable sources.--Pmedema (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not particularly notable, and one of many such projects. rootology  ( T ) 13:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Mattie TK  14:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Articles in Time magazine and The Independent. Also in the New York Times. This Macworld review notes it has been around since 1999, so not some minor startup, plus it's the only browser that is "still actively supported not only on Mac OS 9, but as far back as System 7.1—and even on 68k Macs". A fact that gets it recommended by Mozilla. Tassedethe (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Tassedethe has pretty clearly demonstrated that good sources exist.-Wafulz (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep given the sources presented by Tassedethe. the wub "?!"  18:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per citations & because it is the most recently maintained browser for the classic Mac OS (per Mozilla's recommendation). --Karnesky (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep huh??? It was reviewed at least twice by Ars Technica. It had one of very few independent CSS compatible rendering engines, as shown in the comparison of HTML rendering engines article. It's still the #1 browser on some platforms. Potatoswatter (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the sources mentioned by Tassedethe there are plenty of articles on Mac-specific sites. It was one of the first browsers to pass the Acid2 test and has been featured in several other speed/rendering tests. Tasnu Arakun (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.