Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

ICall
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NCORP fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't seem to meet NCORP requirements --Adamant1 (talk) 08:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very little coverage. WP:NCORP does not appear to be met. -- Kinu t/c 23:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Distinguishing this from a helpline of the same name and a later iCall Suite, I am not seeing evidence that this company and its product attained notability. The references in the article fall under trivial coverage in the current WP:NCORP (tighter than the criteria in place at the 2012 AfD). There is a 2010 NYT product review (visible on the domain-for-sale page) but I don't see that test-drive as providing more than basic verification that it existed. AllyD (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.