Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICharts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

ICharts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete References fails the criteria for establishing notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 17:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 20:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The only independent source is the one from CNET, and that's not sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH.  --Hirsutism (talk) 20:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.