Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IChrome Ltd.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 17:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

IChrome Ltd.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Refs consist of the program manual, and articles of its use in particular situation.  DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I simply found nothing better than a few Books and browser links. Pinging past users, , , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  19:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing at all on News or Newspapers, a few hits Books and Scholar, and a couple of hits on Highbeam. All brief mentions. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by anon User:2602:30A:2EFE:F050:E52A:8C67:E2A2:B864 with the following rationale "WP:CONTESTED"; that anon deprodded a number of articles with such meaningless rationale before disappearing, likely a WP:POINT disruption or a spammer trying to waste our time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  07:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.