Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICrossing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

ICrossing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Company is wholly unremarkable. Only sources (very few reliable ones) available discuss its acquisition and its new CEO, nothing more. Sources cited are not extensive and are of poor reliability. Article was created bypassing several AfC declines. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: I was surprised to see an AFD for a firm with 900 employees. There's plenty of source material in respected publications, like AdAge CorporateM (Talk) 05:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the fact it reads like a promo, IMHO it needs WP:BLOWNUP and rewritten. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd like to see better than the sources given above, per WP:CORPDEPTH. --j⚛e deckertalk 00:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.