Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDWCRR – iRacing Drivers World Championship Road Racing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 02:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

IDWCRR – iRacing Drivers World Championship Road Racing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Has had no attempt at referencing after six months, no attempt made to establish notability. The bundled in season articles have even less notability and primary author appears hostile to the concept. Falcadore (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Additional comment one of the justification provided on the talk page of one of the season articles is that two professional racing drivers have taken part in this series. It has never been established that I am aware of that what on athlete does as a hobby is even encyclopedic.
 * Originally this began from the two season articles which seem to fail levels of notability. Computer game campaigns have not to my knowledge previously been considered encyclopedic or notable, but added the main article as it has similar issues. --Falcadore (talk) 21:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Additional comment one of the justification provided on the talk page of one of the season articles is that two professional racing drivers have taken part in this series. It has never been established that I am aware of that what on athlete does as a hobby is even encyclopedic.
 * Originally this began from the two season articles which seem to fail levels of notability. Computer game campaigns have not to my knowledge previously been considered encyclopedic or notable, but added the main article as it has similar issues. --Falcadore (talk) 21:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:DIRECTORY. This information is much better suited at the game/simulator's official website.  Any notable info could be moved to the prose of IRacing.com, which I just gave an overhaul per WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. --Teancum (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: as above; fork of an article that has zero need of any. And don't worry about it, Falcadore - if I had a dollar for every time I read a justification which had nothing to do with policy or guideline for why an article was important, I could live in a mansion in Tahiti.   Ravenswing  17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability since it has no references. Even if it has some, I would need to see strong references to prove that it has widespread notability (not specialist).  Royal broil  13:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.