Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Africa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ID Africa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

UPE article where article creator is now blocked, created for an organization that doesn’t possess WP:CORPDEPTH nor satisfy WP:CORP at all as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A before search did show this & this but both are not sufficient to satisfy WP:CORP. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 15:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Indeed. Looking at all the sources that were chosen to include in the article, many of them share content with each other as well as with other sources. I can find the same cited content appearing under the byline of Opeyemi Kehinde on the Daily Trust site, Ugo Onwuaso on the Nigeria Communications Week site, AwesomeCon on Brand Communications, Raheem Akingbolu on This Day Live, and gnadmin on Good News Nigeria. Some of the sources consist of content replicated on other sites under the byline BHM, which is the marketing company behind this operation. All of this, in addition to the clear PR feel of all these pieces, demonstrates that the sources are all PR-generated material, not independent, reliable sources. Largoplazo (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CORP and WP:GNG require WP:SIGCOV and the sources in article and from WP:BEFORE show this doesn't exist.   // Timothy ::  talk  04:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.