Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Experiential


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deryck C. 22:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

ID Experiential

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Has won a lot of industry awards of the type they all have. (I previously removed Bronze awards etc) Philafrenzy (talk) 10:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  22:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable experiential marketing business. SaveATreeEatAVegan 19:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.