Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Productions Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

ID Productions Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

ID Productions Inc does not appear to be notable. The article does not cite independent reliable sources. I haven't found any sources that indicate notability. I am One of Many (talk) 07:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep As per significant coverage. LenaLeonard (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * As per what significant coverage? There are no non-primary sources in the article, and the nominator hasn't been able to find any after searching for some either. It's certainly possible that there is significant coverage out there — but you can't just assert that, you gotta show your work. Bearcat (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I believe this company is not notable. Steam5 (talk) 07:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - LenaLeonard's assertion that there is significant is simply not true. There are plenty of primary sources, and unreliable ones (IMDB), but there is a significant lack of coverage in reliable sources. In fact, there's generally a lack of coverage in any sources, apart from some non-notable local awards. Article is pretty much purely promotional, and none of their films appear to be notable. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 14:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if the films or director were notable (they aren't), the production company behind them doesn't inherit their notability.  None of the sources presented are actually about the production company itself.   Therefore, I would contend there are no reliable secondary sources in this article at all or any to be found.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 15:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the info is coming from sources that aren't reliable in the least. I.E. IMDB- every film related thing ever has an IMDB page, it doesn't prove notability. Ducknish (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If somebody can actually find some evidence of actual coverage in reliable sources out there, I'm willing to reconsider this — but as written this article (a) relies entirely on primary sources and directories that don't demonstrate notability, and (b) is almost certainly a WP:COI given the creator's username (User:Distributionid). And accordingly, as written it's a delete unless somebody can salvage it with much better references, although we might also consider pushing it back into the user's sandbox where it started. Bearcat (talk) 05:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.