Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp  💬  17:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be minimal coverage outside of IEEE beyond adverts for their conferences/journals, or institutions saying one of their members has won an award from an IEEE UFFC event. Has been PRODed before. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge per WP:ATD-M and WP:IGNORINGATD. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you have any independant sources that show that this particular article should be kept? -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The nominator is supposed to make a detailed search and says here that there is minimal coverage. They can start us off by listing the coverage they found and then we'll decide for ourselves whether it's minimal. Andrew🐉(talk) 23:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not how it works, and you know that. The onus is on editors who seek to retain the material to find reliable sources to source it, not on nominators to prove a negative.   Ravenswing      03:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

*Delete: Fails the GNG and WP:ORG; no WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources, and no valid keep argument proffered.   Ravenswing     23:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this doesn't seem notable enough for an article. Merging isn't an option IMO either. Since the information is badly sourced and trivial anyway. Someone could just as easily write it for whatever article it would be merged to. I highly doubt anyone would be using it as a search term either. So, merging is completely pointless. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If there's a legit redirect target, I'm fine with that; *Redirect to Institute_of_Electrical_and_Electronics_Engineers   Ravenswing     03:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Certainly seems to be leaning towards redirect but owing to age of article and assertion of notability will relist to see if an affirmative case for keeping can be made.
 * Redirect to Institute_of_Electrical_and_Electronics_Engineers, where it is already mentioned. As a longstanding Society of the IEEE, I think this is a plausible cut-and-paste search term and for manual searches, "IEEE U" already brings it up as the first result in the search popup box. -- 00:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect In addition to 's point, it is also a plausible link name in articles like engineers' biographies, or in citations to publications associated with them. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Mark Viking and XOReaster. Reyk YO! 19:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect. More of the IEEE internal non-notable suborganizations. We are not a catalogue of such minute organizational details. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.