Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEdit Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy-delete A7. (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

IEdit Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. WP:BEFORE shows no references in reliable sources.] The only source provided (or, indeed, avaliable) is their own storefront. WP:GNG failure. &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  17:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA WP:COI article on a web design company. Nothing provided or found indicates more than a run-of-the-mill firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. (I have also flagged this CSD A7 as I see no credible claim to notability.) AllyD (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.