Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

IFFHS Top 200 European clubs of the 20th century

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The general article about this was deleted in 2013: Articles for deletion/IFFHS best clubs of the 20th century. This is just a subset of that article for European countries, so should be deleted too, as it's even less notable, and definitely doesn't pass WP:GNG Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no purpose, it's just a mirror of the IFFHS info. Last AFD applies. GiantSnowman 16:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of the standalone notability of this list, and there's no context here either. No point in Wikipedia serving as a simple mirror of the IFFHS website. – PeeJay 16:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Needless stats and pov, already justifiable for delete based on previous AfD. Ajf773 (talk) 10:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per NOM, per previous AfD. Paul W (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Pointless. Nothing else to add. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of GNG and WP:NOTMIRROR also potentially applies Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV are not met properly. A lot is missing on the notability window. Yaxı Hökmdarz (talk) 19:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.