Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFFHS World's Top Goal Scorer 1999


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

IFFHS World's Top Goal Scorer 1999

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Sports Statistics synthesis article. Prose at top not supported by reference." Prod was removed without improvement or any justification. Per WP:NOTSTATS this is inappropriate for WP. Hasteur (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - per G5 blocked user. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 08:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Point of order: Creator of article was not blocked until much after the article was created, therefore CSD:G5 is inappropriate. Hasteur (talk) 11:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Logically, you wouldn't expect a user to be blocked then create an article, would you? The user is socking, see . I'll let another admin make the G5 call. GiantSnowman 17:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No SPI has been started on the puppetmaster, only suspicions based on behavior. I'd rather have an ironclad consensus from AfD to parade around the other IFFHS World's Top Goal Scorer articles than a procedural dismissal. Hasteur (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Editors exclusively editong IFFHS articles, one only appearing after another has been blocked? A classic case of WP:DUCK. We could still launch a SPI though. GiantSnowman 16:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to a SPI proceeding to have a seal of approval, but I'd also like for the AfD to finish for the precedent for future AfDs. Hasteur (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet investigations/محمد الخوبري. GiantSnowman 19:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NOTE, WP:NOTSTATS, WP:COPYVIO. Argyle 4 Life  talk  17:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. deprodded one list like this one that I nominated and then  deprodded another and has created more articles on the subject. For example, IFFHS all-time leading goalscorer has been recreated as IFFHS (World Goalgetter).  Argyle 4 Life  talk  18:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Argyle 4 Life. Cloudz 679 14:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.