Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFIT Health & Fitness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seddon talk 23:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

IFIT Health & Fitness

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, with pseudo-references that are PR pieces and/or passing mentions. I note the declaration by a paid editor in compliance with Wikipedia policies, and they have contributed via edit requests. . (I seem to have made a mistake; it was not edited by the same editor a the other article. ). But still it's fundamentally an advertisement. Please see also. Articles for deletion/IFit (brand)  DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP and is WP:ADMASQ. I concur with the nominator in their analysis of the alleged references  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 11:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking further at this and relate articles, what we really need is a selective merge, but Im not sure even under what name it should be, Maybe some volunteer editor without coi but interested in the subject area might want to do this.  DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: Note that prior to a month or so ago, the company's name was ICON Health & Fitness; therefore Google searches for significant coverage should include that and also "ICON Health and Fitness" since some media renders it that way. I am in favor of keeping the article, especially considering the company's ownership of NordicTrack and other brands, and its manufacture of Gold's Gym–branded products. I see significant independent reliable coverage online (especially the ICON name) once one scrolls past the ubiquitous shopping sites that end up at the top of Google. (Note that although Icon Health & Fitness has been listed as a COI on my userpage since December, I never ended up editing this article or making any edit requests. In February I made an edit request on the talkpage of the subsidiary iFit (brand) for the founding date in its infobox to be corrected; an editor implemented that in March, but that was my only involvement with that article.) TerryBG (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage about the merger, financial restructuring, and brand name change to demonstrate notability. Multi7001 (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.