Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFLAC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

IFLAC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. The references given are a one line index entry and a list of publications by members of the organisation. Google searches show mentions in blogs and social media and directories but no significant coverage in WP:reliable sources. noq (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete the reliable sources are not independent, and there isn't any other in depth coverage. A noble purpose, and well known founder does not grant notability. Notability is not inherited. Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and per - Non notable organization with no evidence of any notability. – Davey 2010  •  (talk)  14:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom.,, and --Jersey92 (talk) 00:13, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.