Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFrogz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

IFrogz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason: Fails WP:NN. No ascertation of notability.  Kevinwong913 Speak out loud! 22:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable at all. Yechiel Man 22:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A quick search on google, and after reading the page, does not seem notable enough for wikipedia.   Asics    talk  Editor review! 22:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Their products have been the subject of a number of reviews by industry specific sources, such as, ,  and . Granted, some of these are from blogs or e-zines and their reliability might be a little on the low side, but a google search finds their products have been reviewed several times in such fora.  Notability is rather on the low side though, and I'd not be personally devastated if this one goes down.  Ark yan   (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as this stub is pure product placement. --Gavin Collins 07:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 09:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.