Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IHealth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

IHealth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing sufficient external coverage. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Not enough independent reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability policy. QuackGuru ( talk ) 20:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Most of the sources are from internal sources by the company. I think if better sources can be found, then it may have a chance to stay.Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 01:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.