Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IIC Technologies Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

IIC Technologies Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nearly unsourced (sourced to company registrar). BEFORE doesn't yield enough sources for WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH - few google news and books hits, and they do not cover the company at length. Icewhiz (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Note - was rejected at AfC twice. I don't think this is a WP:G11 fail (as it is not unambiguously promotional) - but a sourcing fail, and no realistic chance at notability.Icewhiz (talk) 13:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete- Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The article reads like a company press release.  FITINDIA   14:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- Article went through the AFC process and was repeatedly declined. Editor then ignored all the comments and decided to publish anyway. Editor also has an undisclosed WP:COI. David. moreno 72    07:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Essentially just a minor variation of this Draft:IIC Technologies which has failed AfC multiple times for lack of notability and promotional concerns. Even if promo is addressed, notability and COI will remain as reasons for deletion.pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - clearly intended to be promotional. . . Mean as custard (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.