Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IIPC TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  19:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

IIPC TV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find significant coverage or any independent coverage for that matter, so fails WP:NMEDIA. Related to Articles for deletion/International Islamic Propagation Center, the organisation behind this channel. HyperGaruda (talk) 18:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Internet streaming channels are not handed an automatic inclusion freebie in Wikipedia just because their own self-published web presence technically verifies that they exist — the notability test for getting into Wikipedia requires a topic to receive coverage in reliable sources that are independent of it, such as newspapers and magazines and books. But there are no sources of that type being shown here at all, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to show sources of that type. If International Islamic Propagation Center were somehow to get kept, then this could be redirected there — but it doesn't appear on track to get kept either. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to lack sigcov. Also, Youtube channel has 5.6K subscribers, Twitter account has more follows (15K) than followers (13.8K), and the app has few ratings so these are all indications of limited audience (though, conversely, large numbers do not necessarily indicate popularity) . If this AFD is to close before the IIPC one, it might be simplest to close this as a redirect, and then let it get a speedy WP:G8 if the IIPC ends up a delete. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.