Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILM Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 03:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

ILM Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines Wikipedia:CORPDEPTH and lacks even lack trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful, unfortunately. Saqib (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Believe that have enough references for it. Maybe need more references and mark it as need more references. Deletion should not be an option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.87.192.71 (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Saqib User:Saqib, I hope you are doing good. You are doing great work. I appreciate for the community, Instead of removing content from ILM Society and nominating page for deletion, you should be finding and adding reliable sources as per Wikipedia Policy.

I hope that you will be removing the notice now. Looking forward to build a better community. Jalismirza (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is promotional and no third-party sources to establish notability. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  12:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Do not think, its quite notable as of now, so its a delete.   M A A Z     T A L K   00:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. No third-party sources to establish notability. Seems like promotional article. Park3r (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.