Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILeap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | babble _ 17:07, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

ILeap

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no references, and none I am able to easily find. I think the topic is not very notable, and the article is formatted like an advertisement. Therefore, it should be deleted in accordance with policy and guidelines. - HectorAE (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I could not find any reliable sources. --Boson (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. On notability, the string 'iLEAP' has apparently been independently invented several times.  But adding 'Hindi' to the search yields four incidental mentions or routine announcements of its release. There might of course be non-Latin script sources.  But it's too soon to worry about notability here: this article is unambiguous advertising (Some important features of [iLeap]: 1. It is simple and easily understandable. 2. It has spell checker in many languages. 3. It has various keyboard layout options.....) and makes no minimal claim of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This is Advertising. Just a list of features copied from the company brochure.  --DavidTTTaylor (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Beyond the promotional tone of the article (G11?), the subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.  Gong   show  19:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, seems to be advertisement! --Tito Dutta (contact) 20:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Not notable, advertising. No bias to recreation if the program eventually receives substantial coverage in secondary sources. PianoDan (talk) 14:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.