Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMAGNiSM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 21:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

IMAGNiSM
Using wikipedia as a soapbox to advertise for an artist, self promotion, advertising, derivitive work from NiGHTS into dreams possible copyright violation (Unsigned vote by 83.167.250.38, whose only contributions have been adding this to AfD.)


 * I oppose this. It's merely trying to inform, not advertise; it's hardly self-promotion given that it was not made by Lynne, and no copyrighted material from NiGHTS has been used without due credit. (Copyright doesn't really apply in a dream, does it? Even so, it's recognised that NiGHTS as a concept is Sega's work; Lynne merely built up a character from the base in her dreams.) ThomasWinwood 00:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 16:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Where to begin? fancruft, original research, nn personal game character, unencyclopedic nonsense, advertising? MCB 21:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Where to begin? Neologism? Vanity? tin foil hattery? The mind boggles. Denni &#9775; 02:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll repeat what I said on the article's talk page: As big a fan I am of the game and of the artwork of some of the people involved, this really isn't notable enough to have a Wikipedia page all to itself. Suggest adding some of the information from this page to the "Reaction" section of NiGHTS Into Dreams, to give a brief outline of the fan community. --Nick R 14:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.