Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMOD (herbal extract)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A two-year history of concerns about the reliability and independence of the article's sources, combined with no support for its retention in this debate. The consensus appears to be that this article is based on a very shaky foundation of unreliable sources. ~ mazca  talk 02:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

IMOD (herbal extract)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It comprehensively relies on primary sources. No successful results has been announced by independent sources. There are no RS coverage and no secondary sources (under WP:RSMED) in the article and all are unreliable medical sources. ● Mehran Debate● 13:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Unproven and non-notable therapy. The few links found at Google Scholar claim effectiveness for lots of other conditions, but not AIDS as this article claims - a classic snake-oil approach. The articles at Google Scholar are minimally cited, and no secondary sources are found to demonstrate notability per GNG. --MelanieN (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.