Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMSIN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedied as a personal attack --humblefool&reg; 22:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

IMSIN


No ghits for IMSIN in that context. Maybe even a speedy nonsense candidate. Optimale Gu 15:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even if it were verifiable, the article is still nothing more than a neoligism. →Bobby ← 16:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * A lawyer has created a Wikipedia article criticising the writing style of xyr colleague. This is a hairsbreadth away from being an attack article.  It's certainly not an encyclopaedia article.  Delete. Uncle G 16:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ASAP This is such a thinly veiled attack upon another lawyer that I would say it's not disguised at all. The article is an embarassment to the legal community, and not in a good way, either.  According to the text of the article it would seem that the target of the article has sent out a mass e-mail message to a list of attorneys, and those people who received it will easily be able to identify the target of the demeaning remarks. The creator of the article in the edit history for his contribution to another article says he is the director of Virgin Islands Search & Rescue.  I don't know if that means he is a lawyer, but where I come from making an article like this would be a very, very bad thing for a lawyer to do.  OfficeGirl 20:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.