Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMS Health


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

IMS Health

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

G11 While I think probably passing notability, the page reads clearly as a promotional page. In fact a user from the company is the one that admits editing the page. Caffeyw (talk) 07:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. As the nominator says this is a notable company, and the article is worded descriptively, not promotionally at all. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment - Instead of deleting an article for its content issues, we should probably tag and edit the article to improve the issues. If the company is notable, then by definition, a complete and well-written article can be written from reliable sources. Improving an article is always an better alternative than blowing it up. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Fairly well established company. I think it satisfies WP:ORG well enough to keep the article. It has a ton of references, all pretty decent. No reason to delete. scope_creep talk 17:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.