Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMTS Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

IMTS Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Permotions page doesn't meet WP:GNG Wikiindiawikiindia (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC) (sock strike Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)) Relisting comment: Relisting. Can editors advocating "Keep" share some of these reliable sources? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Wikiindiawikiindia (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: I Believe that this article should not be removed because IMTS Institute is having reliable news coverage. CKNetha (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete too much promotion. - a website about us has less promotions than this piece of "news". --多少 战场 龙 (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: calling for a procedural renomination(conditional) as the article nominator is turned out to be a sock. RPSkokie (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:43, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:GNG. Found many news from reliable sources in a google search. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 09:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - I'm finding plenty of typically reliable sources mentioning this institute, sure, but I cannot find a single source that is providing independent significant coverage. Basically all of them are simply promoting the college unambiguously in some capacity. A lot of the articles I'm finding are following basically the same format as, which just seems like a press release going over the school's history and/or accomplishments, or they have clear indicators of being press releases (e.g BRAND POST, BRAND CONNECT, IMPACT FEATURE, If you have any objection to this press release content) Other examples of sources I found that appear promotional include: . The Hindustan Times one appears to be down for me right now, but it clearly says press release in the citation and in the URL it says brand-post. Because most all sources I'm finding are probably sponsored in some capacity by the institute, rather than genuine coverage by reliable sources, I think deletion is appropriate. — Sirdog (talk) 08:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be promotional, and most of the media sources in the references appear to be press release or paid promotional content. That appears to be the case with most or all of the coverage of the institute. WP:NBUY is relevant here. Chagropango (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 *  Keep : I Believe that the page should not be deleted because it also having more organically generated news coverage and same has been updated in the page. CKNetha (talk) 18:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * CKNetha, you can comment but you can only "vote" once so I have struck your duplicate vote to Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) in India need to be recognised by the University Grants Commission (UGC). This institute seems to be a repetition of the case of Indian Institute of Planning and Management and its founder Arindam Chaudhuri. Article on WP will be used to scam and fraud innocent Indians as it was done in the case of aforementioned institute. Once the institute gets UGC recognition, it can be an article. As of now, it fails to qualify as an HEI in India. User4edits (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.