Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMUS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

IMUS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This system is just a way of combining integration of the company's digestor with outside products,and amounts to no more than a tradename. Only one of the sources is a secondary source (a regional newspaper), and it talks more about the company than the process. It shouldn't be discussed separates; and, as a rather generic phrase, doesn't even need a redirect.  DGG ( talk ) 22:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: nothing within the article or any sources in an admittedly cursory search suggests a reason why this particular process is notable beyond the company's own hyperbole. The information in this article is also contained in Himark BioGas, which is a straight-up advert and could as it stands have an AfD of its own. &mdash; ATinySliver &#47; ATalkPage 22:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Really nothing new or unique. It's merely an embellishment of biogas by a company for advert purpose. See the definitions, they are almost verbatim statements, and exactly with same meanings. No difference whatsoever. Chhandama (talk) 04:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.